School Obama’s Daughters Attend Has 11 Armed Guards

The School Obama's Daughter's Attend Has 11 Armed Guards.
But He Won't Consider It An Option For Your Kids.

51 comments:

Anonymous said...

Typical politician. Do as I say not as I do.

Anonymous said...

Ah damn asses, all da presidents kids had guards, and certain schools have security, so do some research before you start posting dhit like this. Dumbasses.

Matt Beaver said...

Here is the difference. The government should funnel more taxes into schools to make this happen. I guarantee our taxes pay for his kids and I guarantee most schools that have security are private or inner city schools that have clear and present danger.

I have yet to research, but if your willing to post findings that contradict my beliefs I certainly welcome them.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, and whats your point??? We still should have them for all kids! Our kids saftey is an issue for all parents now, and if its considered OK or justified for a president - ANY president - than it should be considered OK for evryone else's kids!

Anonymous said...

sure all presidents children are guarded not just while their father is in office but for entire life...and all former presidents/family etc have security with them all times. Why cant we do this for our children , get your facts straight..most school have no type of security or if they do its poor and can easily be broken..

Anonymous said...

Welcome to one step closer to a Police State. Thank you for your communistic fear mongering view.

Anonymous said...

Now this a really piss poor comparison. Apples & Oranges

gaurav singh said...

so whats wrong with it .....

Anonymous said...

Their were 138,925 schools in 2010. (Latest info I could find). If we were to have 11 armed officers with an US national average salary of $50,000 at each school this would cost approx $76,408,750,000 per year (Not including bonuses and benefits). Now how do you propose they fit this into a budget that is already trillions in debt.

However on a flip side it would create 1.5 million jobs.

Everyone talks about how they want the Government to reduce the debt but they have no problem adding to it.

elisha said...

The point is, he wants to outlaw some guns! He is gearing up for gun control legislation yet his children are guarded! While his children are more likely to be attacked all of our children are equally precious and if guns are allowed to protect his children then guns cant be all bad! Pear Mississippi is the school shooting nobody talks about the one where the principal went to his car and got his gun and put a bullet in the shooters head and saved lives! Thats the one they do not talk about! Gun control legislation has no hope of controling guns!

Anonymous said...

Are You All Bind, Let's put it this way ( WHAT IS GOOD FOR ONE PERSONS KID'S WEITHER IT BE THAT ASS HOLE OBAMA'S KID'S (OR) ANYONE ELSE'S KIDS IF IT GOOD FOR ONE IT SHOULD (OR) HAVE TO BE GOOD FOR ALL (OR) NONE!!! Have a Good Day All!!!!

Anonymous said...

For everyone who says this post is stupid, think about it, of course the president and his family has protection, and the point of this post is to say that the only thing protecting THEM from a bad guy with a gun is other GOOD guys with guns e.i. the SECRET SERVICE. He doesn't seem to object to guns being around him and his daughters at all times, yet objects to this when its everyone else's kids. This gun control is flawed logic when the president of the United States will ALWAYS have a protective gun near him, yet says its not necessary for our children. If it protects the important people, is that saying that our children aren't important enough for even a single guard to protect thousands of kids? If he truly wants gun control, then he shouldn't be allowed to have protection for himself and his family either, it's only fair to "We The People". Thomas Jefferson - "Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry."

Unknown said...

Thank you. I did that explanation on FB for someone that shared this...

Anonymous said...

How much is the life of one child worth? How bout 2? How bout twenty?

And why would every school need 11 officers? I bet you could make due with 1 or 2 at most schools. And in some communities I bet you could use 1 or 2 officers for a group of schools that are in close proximity.

William Mastric said...

You know you people really need to pull your head out of butts and come live with the rest of us. Regardless of what we did in the other schools, the President's children and family are protected because of who they are. If that was a Republican President, his children would be protected in the same manner. So why don't you create something else. You don't need more police in the schools. You don't need any guns in the schools. Why don't you people work about getting guns off the streets and out of the hands of people who only want to hurt someone. I have guns, but if a law was passed that said I had to turn them in, then I would comply. You people are idiots.

Anonymous said...

I think you got the idiot wrong here. If guns were illegal then the only people to have them would be the military and the BAD guys. Drugs have been illegal for a very long time, so I guess they are gone now too.

Anonymous said...

The main point to consider is that we are the one country that has been given the constitutional right by our forefathers to protect ourselves. So anyone wanting to take the weapons of law abiding citizens away, is un-American... PERIOD! Best intention is moot.

So why should we have these weapons? After the success of Pearl Harbor, the Emperor of Japan gathered his advisers and wanted a plan to successfully invade and occupy the U.S. (remember, Hawaii at the time was just a territory). One of the admirals responded by telling the emperor such an idea would be folly because "there will be a weapon behind every blade of grass".

You see, while Japan did not fear our military (evident from the attack on Pearl Harbor), they did fear the citizens of the U.S. because it understood the significance of our 2nd Amendment right to bear arms.

It's time to stop demonizing weapons as the tool of the aggressor and embrace them as the equalizing tool of the defenders!

Anonymous said...

he also rides in air force one and lives in the white house. it all comes with the territory.

Anonymous said...

to be honest, i don't think 11 armed men could have prevented the sandy hook mass shooting from happening. at best it could have limited the number of casualties.

Anonymous said...

Are you kidding??? If they seen someone in the parking lot with a rifle they would have dropped his ass right where they stood without hesitation ....

Anonymous said...

Isn't that the point??

Anonymous said...

I wonder how much it will cost to create this registry and support it?? Probably more than your little estimate on security. Why don't these school districts, that have 20 football coaches per team, fire a couple of them to pay for the security. Problem Solved!

Anonymous said...

Thank you! Some logic here^

Anonymous said...

Excellent response

Anonymous said...

These anti-gun liberals don't like to think much do they; it seems their own judgments on what "sounds" ideal overrides their logic/reality center

Anonymous said...

My Grand children go to a secure school, It is a public, not private. it has 6 guardians and security cameras, all are paid for with school tax's nobody can get in or out, all entries are locked down and anyone coming to the school for delivery, or visiting, goes through a security screening, each and everytime they come to the school. This used to be a very violent school, there hasn't been a problem there in 10 years, and the kids love it, the only compliant they have ever had is from dumb parents.

Anonymous said...

Additionally, the right to keep and bear arms is to protect the rights of the state over the federal government should it become abusive.

We have already seen it is and hence the "tongue in cheek" sucessionist movement...but none the less, the right to keep and bear arms is to prevent a govt from becoming out of control and abusing it's citizens...that's the primary purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

drclean said...

william mastric,,,then you will be a slave

Juan Fulano said...

Don't you realize by now that the UK is not the only country with Royalty.
We have ours.....The Congress, The Senate, and the entire Administration; including the First Family. GET USE TO IT....IT AIN'T GOING TO CHANGE; NOT EVEN UNDER OUR FUTURE SOCIALIST SOCIETY!

Anonymous said...

Wow for one it's not that simple to just take guns from the ones that want to hurt people because usually they get the gun from there parent or steal them from someone who in sane and has a permit- there should be a trained person in each school ready to use a fire arm and save the innocent lives of students... Until that happens these school shooters and want to be's will always know they when they walk in to schools and shooting that they hold the power- we need to take that power back..

Anonymous said...

I would volunteer, and I am guessing others would, too! I also believe that there are many teachers who would/could volunteer to "protect our children/their students if it came down to it. I also agree with these other replies...Why would it have to be 11 officers, and why $50k? That's bull! What do our airline sercurity officers get paid? Certainly isn't $50K.

Anonymous said...

Only takes 1 bullet to enter a lock door!!! Security cameras do not stop bullets. If the kids are locked in, what do they do in case of a fire???

Anonymous said...

him having gaurds protecting his daughters is something all presidents have. I have no problem with that. the problem I do have is these liberal dems, and movie stars I see on u tube talking bout gun control. well it makes no sense. if u rich ppl, and congressmen and gvt ppl including the president want to take the guns out of law abiding citizens hands then take them out of the hands of your bodygaurds and secret service. because in your theory , bad ppl wont be able to get guns anymore so u shouldnt need them either. but I believe the bigger picture is they want to ultimately take them away and make it illegal to have. the gvt prefers unarmed peasants

Anonymous said...

When Guns are Outlawed, Only Outlaws will have Guns! William, turn your gun in, but don't ask me for Protections because you give up!

Anonymous said...

This is not true. There are not 11 armed guards. There are only 11 people in the whole security dept at the school including weekend guards, on call substitutes, supervisors, and director. There is no evidence that they are armed only that 5 of them are Special Police Officers; but, in DC Special Police Officers in schools and universities usually only have batons and pepper spray.

Anonymous said...

cut military and use some of that shit

Anonymous said...

Obama is not preventing schools from having security. Schools do not have the funding because our government does not provide enough money. Schools get most of their money from the local government, which is why more affluent areas tend to have better schools and test scores. I am a teacher in an affluent area. My school district would never consider armed guards an option because it would not display a positive image to the community. It is not as simple as the president saying that schools should have armed guards and then every school gets them. Your comment is inflammatory and uninformed.

Anonymous said...

Do you people really think this is true.

Anonymous said...

You seriously think the President's children are not protected by people with guns?

Anonymous said...

The United States provides alot more money per student than most countries in the world and we are still cranking out graduates (the 69% who make it that far) who can't read or point to their home state on a map. Regarding the idea that armed guards wouldn't display positive image, I think it'd be more accurate to say that having guns in schools doesn't fit the NEA's progressive agenda. They would have parents believe that having armed guards in school would necessitate guns slung on hips, guard towers over the cafeteria, and children trying to learn in a environment where guns levitate around the room randomly killing people. Is there a reason that a school can't have some security professionals or off-duty police officers dressed in khakis and their weapons hidden under a sport coat? Does your affluent community have armed police officers in the street?

Anonymous said...

Don't kid yourselves. After the Sandy Hook tragedy, The first thing the President did is focus on the guns. There was no suggestion of more aggressive enforcement of existing gun laws (20,000 of them). There was no discussion about perhaps the need to require a safe or a method to secure the guns either from children or thieves. Because I would agree too many Americans don't treat guns with the respect they deserve, and I'm not talking about the NRA types.

No, the President went straight to the idea that certain guns should be restricted (of course not the ones protecting HIS daughters), because they are scary "military guns" as if these guns do something "non-military" guns don't do. The fact is the civilian AR-15 or AK-47 don't do anything any other semi-auto rifle does. It just shoots a bullet. One bullet per trigger squeeze. In both cases a round that is weaker than your average hunting cartridge with less power and range than the rifles our grandfathers carried in WW2 and Korea. Colt has sold the AR-15 to civilians since the 60's. They gun hasn't changed much since the 60's, but our character of our nation has. Fewer fathers raising their sons. No morality taught or enforced in schools for fear of hurting someone's feelings or offending them, or damaging the esteem they are given but never have to earn. No talk of good and evil anymore, just behaviorism and the search for a pill that will fix it. Movies and video games that have desensitized us all to violence.

Blaming the gun or a class of guns is stupid and shows a lack of imagination. A group of men with box cutters and a plan killed 3000 in a single morning. What can a madman do with one handgun and three 10 rounds magazines? Another tragedy! So get rid of handguns. Let's say all we can have are bolt action hunting rifles. Now, the madman will kill from a quarter mile away, and he'll do it for weeks on end until no one ventures out of their houses. How about a 5 gallon can of gas?

And all of this will have no effect whatsoever on the criminal. He'll get outlawed guns just like he gets outlawed drugs.

Call and write your congressmen. Freemen, truly freemen, have the right and means to defend themselves. Government has been set up to protect the rights of freemen, not restrict them.

Jim said...

former President's kids do not get secret service.

Anonymous said...

Why would any dumbass that may or may not have any idea about the security of these kids post anything that would compromise their saftey?

Anonymous said...

From the secret service web site.......children of former presidents get protection until age 16........

Anonymous said...

http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml

So, Boehner, and anyone else in line for the Presidency as outlined in the Constitution and their immediate family members ALL get SS protection!

Anonymous said...

Some of you people are pretty dense. I agree with the discrepancy and the picture. No further comment.

Anonymous said...

BAD GUYS DON'T OBEY THE LAW. THEY DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT IT AND IF A LAW WAS PASSED MANDATING YOU TURN YOUR GUNS IN YOU'LL BE THE FIRST ONE FACING THE BUSINESS END OF ONE WHILE THE BAD GUYS CLEAN YOU OUT AND THERE WONT BE A DAMN THING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT. YA GO AHEAD AND TRY TO CALL THE POLICE, SEE HOW QUICKLY THEY SHOOT YOU WHEN YOU ATTEMPT THAT STUNT.

Anonymous said...

HELL YA!

Anonymous said...

No, not really, kids are kids. but I guess his kids are more important than ours. why? who knows, dumber than stones the both of them anyhow. Not like they are going to grow up to be anyone anyways. Nigges are niggers always will be.
To solve this problem get that communist bastard nigger out of the white house and all this shit goes away, at least there wont be any ore govt ops killing our kids especially when we know its a false flag event designed to take our guns, Fuck obongo and his govt

James Brown said...

He maybe our President, but I love my kids just the same, and they and yours deserve protection from terrorist and criminals at these gun-free school zones. They are and open invitation to what's happening in America today.

James Brown said...

He maybe our President, but I love my kids just the same, and they and yours deserve protection from terrorist and criminals at these gun-free school zones. They are and open invitation to what's happening in America today.